survey

[Mike Lysik]

Let's only send and reply to eefc-core at workingcode.com from now on.  I'm 
getting double emails which make things more confusing than it has to be.

I agree, let's wait for Tim's #, and go from there.  My take on the 
financing was this...we agree on a final price including upgrades.  We go to 
a bank for a loan, and EE is the guarantor on the loan.  We own the plane, 
and EE gets paid the fair value of the plane in it's current state, plus the 
upgrades we're proposing.

Mike
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Carlson" <carlsonj at workingcode.com>
To: "Bob Irving" <rhirving at verizon.net>
Cc: <eefc-core at workingcode.com>
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: survey


> Bob Irving writes:
>> Are we thinking that we will propose 3  different airplanes at different
>> price levels (40-50-60) and ask everyone to vote on what they want? I 
>> think
>> this approach would be a mistake. We will end up with 4 people choosing
>> option#1, 4 people choosing option#2, 3 choosing option#3, etc. Nobody 
>> will
>> be happy.
>
> I would offer the three options and request that people say (for each
> option):
>
> - would prefer this one if it were chosen
> - neither prefer nor reject
> - would not join club if it were chosen
>
> In other words, a vote of +1 / 0 / -1 on each plane.  We can figure
> the membership from the '-1' entries.  We need to eliminate from
> consideration any plane that has so many '-1' votes that we don't have
> enough people to continue, and eliminate from consideration for the
> initial membership anyone who doesn't answer.  We can figure the plane
> choice from the remaining votes and planes by looking at the '+1'
> entries.
>
> -- 
> James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <carlsonj at workingcode.com>
> _______________________________________________
> eefc-core mailing list
> eefc-core at workingcode.com
> https://www.workingcode.com/mailman/listinfo/eefc-core