UAS updates
James Carlson
carlsonj at workingcode.com
Tue Feb 19 10:21:29 EST 2019
I've been gathering updates and changes that may affect how you operate
within Part 107, and I have four important ones that I think you should
know about. (Please let me know if you don't want updates like this
from me in the future; I'll be happy to remove you from the list.)
1. ID Number Marking Change
On February 25th, new rules (RIN 2120-AL32) will go into effect for
UAS registration markings. You can't place the registration sticker
(for Part 48) inside an interior compartment anymore. It must be on
the outside of the aircraft.
This is an Interim Final Rule, which means that it goes into effect
before the comment period ends. You can comment on the rule before
March 15th, if you want. (My take is that the new rule isn't a
substantial burden on anyone, and that one could imagine worse
rules.)
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-00765.pdf
Here's the comment page:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/02/13/2019-00765/external-marking-requirement-for-small-unmanned-aircraft
2. Line Of Sight Interpretation
107.31(b) and 107.33 as well as test questions appear to establish
the ability to use visual observers and radio to extend range.
However, both FAA webinars and AC 107-2 describe a much narrower
interpretation that you should be aware of. Neither of those sources
is an official legal interpretation (you can get one of those by
asking the FAA Office of the Chief Counsel or waiting for an NTSB ALJ
ruling), but it's usually the case that if an idea appears in any of
those "non-regulatory" sources, then the FAA is likely to push that
in the future.
There are at least three common interpretations of these rules:
a. As above, it's an "or" relationship, meaning that the observer
can be the only person with eyes on the craft. No other
restrictions are listed.
b. The observer can be used to allow the PIC and/or operator to
use first-person video or binoculars for normal operation, with
the observer making sure the operation stays away from people
and other aircraft.
c. The observer can only help fill in temporary gaps when the PIC
looks away momentarily. The PIC and operator both must always
have contact.
It looks like the FAA is going with (c). Even though it's not
written in Part 107, the interpretation is that 107.31(b) applies
only when the PIC is temporarily looking away and not on a continuous
basis.
Most UASes don't have the battery power to get too far away, so this
should not have a substantial effect on many. But still, to be safe
(and avoid FAA entanglement), here's what I recommend if you need a
large operating area. Either:
A. Have more than one licensed remote pilot on the job. There can
be only one PIC at a time, but it's perfectly legal to hand off
PIC authority at any time, and you can have multiple licensed
operators standing by in different locations to extend range. I
recommend that you use a variation on the standard transfer-
of-controls protocol when doing this:
You: "Joe, you have command."
Joe: "Joe has command."
You (confirming): "Joe has command."
Using that sequence guarantees that there are no
misunderstandings. (Small changes may need to be made if the
other licensed operator is not actually named "Joe.")
B. Get a beyond-line-of-sight waiver. In the waiver application,
you will need to describe how you get the same level of safety.
This likely means:
- Having multiple observers.
- Having a training program for the observers.
- Having some set of clear signals ("climb immediately",
"return to start now") that can be used quickly and
unambiguously.
- Describing the radio (or other) system used for
signaling.
- If you have more than one control operator, explaining
how hand-off occurs between them, and how they hear from
the operators.
- How area hand-offs occur and what to do if there are
radio failures.
Your best bet is to read through successful waivers to get an
idea of what is known to work. For example:
https://www.faa.gov/uas/commercial_operators/part_107_waivers/waivers_issued/media/107W-2018-12266A_Jonathan_Daniels_CoW.pdf
There are thousands more available here:
https://www.faa.gov/uas/commercial_operators/part_107_waivers/waivers_issued/
3. Pass Well Clear Interpretation
When operating beyond the line of visual sight and passing "well
clear" of another aircraft, a new draft Advisory Circular defines
what that phrase means. For the new AC, it means at least 250 feet
vertically (above or below), or 2000 feet horizontally. This isn't
intended to affect "normal" line-of-sight operations under Part 107,
but I believe it will be a useful reference anyway.
https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/draft_docs/media/afs/AC_90-WLCLR_Coord_Copy.pdf
4. Operation Over Certain Facilities
Surprising nobody, the FAA is prohibiting UAS operations over Federal
prisons starting February 26th. You can view the restrictions in the
B4UFLY app and the UAS DDS:
https://faa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=9c2e4406710048e19806ebf6a06754ad
https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=93048
5. Big Changes Coming
RIN 2120-AK85 is a new draft of UAS updates that makes huge changes
in operation for most users. It opens up night operations without a
waiver, requiring instead additional training and lighting systems.
It gives new rules that allow operation over people and moving
vehicles without a special waiver, based on manufacturer safety
demonstration. Biggest of all: it converts the 24 calendar month
renewal into an on-line training program from the FAA, instead of an
expensive new knowledge test.
This is just a draft right now. It's not even an NPRM yet, let alone
a regulation, but it may well be coming soon, and those interested
should keep an eye out for it.
https://www.faa.gov/uas/programs_partnerships/DOT_initiatives/media/2120-AK85_NPRM_Operations_of_Small_UAS_Over_People.pdf
--
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj at workingcode.com>
More information about the UAS-class
mailing list